@article {bnh-1836,
	title = {Sleeping at work: not all about location, location, location},
	journal = {Sleep Medicine Reviews},
	volume = {19},
	year = {2014},
	month = {05/2014},
	pages = {59-66},
	chapter = {59},
	abstract = {<p><span>Working arrangements in industries that use non-standard hours sometimes necessitate an {\textquoteleft}onsite{\textquoteright} workforce where workers sleep in accommodation within or adjacent to the workplace. Of particular relevance to these workers is the widely held (and largely anecdotal) assumption that sleep at home is better than sleep away, particularly when away for work. This narrative review explores the idea that sleep outcomes in these unique work situations are the product of an interaction between numerous factors including timing and duration of breaks, commute length, sleeping environment (noise, movement, vibration, light), circadian phase, demographic factors and familiarity with the sleep location. Based on the data presented in this review, it is our contention that the location of sleep, whilst important, is secondary to other factors such as the timing and duration of sleep periods. We suggest that future research should include measures that allow conceptualisation of other critical factors such as familiarity with the sleeping environment.</span></p>},
	keywords = {Mobile workplaces, Non-residential workforce, Shift work, Sleep, Sleep environment, Sleep loss, Work rest facilities},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2014.04.003},
	url = {http://www.smrv-journal.com/article/S1087-0792(14)00044-6/abstract},
	author = {Sarah M Jay and Brad Aisbett and Sprajcer, M. and Sally Ferguson}
}
