![](https://www.bnhcrc.com.au/sites/default/files/styles/page_hero/public/biblio-heroimage.jpg?itok=07W1Md1N)
PUBLICATIONS
Published works
![](https://www.bnhcrc.com.au/sites/default/files/styles/panopoly_image_full/public/default_images/biblio-default.jpg?itok=gSfjLZLZ)
A radiative transfer model-based method for the estimation of grassland aboveground biomass
Title | A radiative transfer model-based method for the estimation of grassland aboveground biomass |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2017 |
Authors | Quan, X, He, B, Yebra, M, Yin, C, Liao, Z, Zhang, X, Li, X |
Journal | International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation |
Volume | 54 |
Date Published | 02/2017 |
Abstract | This paper presents a novel method to derive grassland aboveground biomass (AGB) based on the PROSAILH (PROSPECT + SAILH) radiative transfer model (RTM). Two variables, leaf area index (LAI, m2m−2, defined as a one-side leaf area per unit of horizontal ground area) and dry matter content (DMC, gcm−2, defined as the dry matter per leaf area), were retrieved using PROSAILH and reflectance data from Landsat 8 OLI product. The result of LAI × DMC was regarded as the estimated grassland AGB according to their definitions. The well-known ill-posed inversion problem when inverting PROSAILH was alleviated using ecological criteria to constrain the simulation scenario and therefore the number of simulated spectra. A case study of the presented method was applied to a plateau grassland in China to estimate its AGB. The results were compared to those obtained using an exponential regression, a partial least squares regression (PLSR) and an artificial neural networks (ANN). The RTM-based method offered higher accuracy (R2 = 0.64 and RMSE = 42.67 gm−2) than the exponential regression (R2 = 0.48 and RMSE = 41.65 gm−2) and the ANN (R2 = 0.43 and RMSE = 46.26 gm−2). However, the proposed method offered similar performance than PLSR as presented better determination coefficient than PLSR (R2 = 0.55) but higher RMSE (RMSE = 37.79 gm−2). Although it is still necessary to test these methodologies in other areas, the RTM-based method offers greater robustness and reproducibility to estimate grassland AGB at large scale without the need to collect field measurements and therefore is considered the most promising methodology. |
URL | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303243416301726 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jag.2016.10.002 |
Refereed Designation | Refereed |
Published Works
![Sourced from: BNHCRC Sourced from: BNHCRC](https://www.bnhcrc.com.au/sites/default/files/styles/logo-framed/public/pubtag-bnhcrc.png?itok=B7ZDS0SN)